Building the Foundation for Change: Sensory Positive Experiences and Balance Exercises as Essential Precursors to Behavioral Intervention in the Canine Neurobiological Systems Science Framework

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of complex canine behavioral cases, particularly those involving trauma histories, has exposed a critical gap in traditional intervention models. Desensitization and counterconditioning (DS/CC), while empirically supported, frequently fail in these populations not due to technical flaws, but due to a fundamental structural mismatch: they are applied to systems lacking the neurobiological capacity to process them. This paper introduces Sensory Positive Experiences (SPEs) and Balance Exercises (BEs)—collectively termed SPE&BE—as a mandatory preparatory protocol within the Canine Neurobiological Systems Science (CNSS) framework. SPE&BE is not a behavioral intervention but a systems-level capacity-building process. It operates by systematically engaging non-contaminated sensory pathways to strengthen prefrontal cortex function and employing vestibular-proprioceptive activities to address dysregulation of the vestibular system. The primary outcome is the establishment of "neurobiological readiness," characterized by consistent access to transitional neurobiological states and emerging executive function indicators on the NeuroBalance Wheel. This paper argues that SPE&BE is not an enrichment activity but a distinct, prerequisite phase that creates the necessary physiological and emotional scaffolding across ten distinct system levels, thereby enabling subsequent evidence-based techniques like DS/CC to succeed where they previously failed.

Keywords: Canine Neurobiological Systems Science, Sensory Positive Experiences, Balance Exercises, Neurobiological Readiness, Trauma, Desensitization, Counterconditioning, Vestibular System, Prefrontal Cortex, Systems Science

Introduction: The Structural Threshold in Canine Behavioral Practice

Veterinary behaviorists and professional dog trainers increasingly encounter cases where dogs with trauma histories prove refractory to standard behavioral protocols. The failure of techniques like desensitization and counterconditioning (DS/CC) in these instances is often attributed to case severity or implementation errors. However, through the lens of Canine Neurobiological Systems Science (CNSS), these failures are recast as predictable outcomes of a structural threshold: the complexity of the case has exceeded the scaffolding capacity of linear, reductionist approaches (Smith, 2025; Sterman, 2000). These approaches implicitly assume a state of "neurobiological readiness"—a nervous system capable of processing exposure, forming new associations, and engaging cognitive resources—that traumatized, dysregulated dogs do not possess (Perry & Szalavitz, 2017; Van der Kolk, 2014). This concept aligns with Siegel's (1999) "window of tolerance," a optimal zone of arousal within which an individual can process information and cope with stressors effectively. Trauma shrinks this window, leaving the individual prone to hyperarousal (fight/flight) or hypoarousal (shutdown/freeze) states where learning and integration cannot occur. As Sapolsky (2017) elaborates, the prefrontal cortex—the seat of executive function and impulse control—is exquisitely vulnerable to stress and is the first brain region to go "offline" under threat, ceding control to the more primitive, reactive amygdala. This neurobiological reality explains why a traumatized dog cannot simply "learn" to be calm.

This paper posits that attempting cognitive-behavioral interventions on a dysregulated system is not merely inefficient but iatrogenic, often reinforcing the very fear patterns it aims to extinguish. The solution lies not in abandoning evidence-based methods but in preceding them with a systematic protocol to establish the foundational capacity they require. Sensory Positive Experiences (SPEs) and Balance Exercises (BEs) form this essential groundwork. SPEs provide safe, rewarding sensory interactions that build trust and reduce stress through non-contaminated pathways, while BEs utilize vestibular and proprioceptive input to regulate arousal and stabilize the nervous system (Porges, 2011; Teixeira et al., 2020). Together, within the CNSS framework, they operationalize the principle that effective intervention requires preparing the system before challenging it.

The CNSS Framework: A Multi-Level Systems Approach

CNSS integrates four scientific domains—neurobiological, psychological, systems, and evaluation sciences—to analyze behavior as an emergent property of complex, adaptive systems. It moves beyond a singular focus on observable behavior to map dysfunction and intervention across multiple interconnected levels.

The Ten System Levels of CNSS

A core tenet of CNSS is that interventions must be targeted at the appropriate system level. Most behavioral modifications, including DS/CC, operate at Level 4, while assuming adequate function at the foundational levels below. SPE&BE specifically targets these deeper levels to create readiness. The ten levels are (Smith, 2025), reflecting a Sapolskian understanding that behavior cannot be understood through a single lens but must be viewed as the cumulative product of seconds-to-millions-of-years-old factors (Sapolsky, 2017).

1.     Level 1: Genetic Predispositions – Breed-typical behaviors and inherited temperament traits, representing the "millions-of-years" evolutionary and "thousands-of-years" domestication history.

2.     Level 2: Prenatal and Early Developmental Experiences – The "thousands-of-days" to "hundreds-of-days" factors, where early environment can epigenetically shape gene expression and neural circuitry (Sapolsky, 2017).

3.     Level 3: Neurobiological Capacity and Regulation – The "seconds-to-minutes" neuroendocrine and autonomic state, which is the primary target of SPE&BE.

4.     Level 4: Individual Learning History and Behavioral Repertoire – The dog's past conditioning and learned behaviors. This is the primary target of DS/CC.

5.     Level 5: Current Emotional and Physiological State – The dog's real-time state of arousal, hunger, fatigue, or pain.

6.     Level 6: Caregiver Habits, Routines, and Regulation – The psychological and physiological state of the primary handler; a key source of co-regulation or dysregulation.

7.     Level 7: Household Dynamics and Environmental Stability – The predictability and safety of the dog's immediate living environment.

8.     Level 8: Professional Influence and Intervention Design – The quality and appropriateness of the professional guidance provided.

9.     Level 9: Community Resources and Social Support – Access to training classes, veterinary care, and community understanding.

10. Level 10: Cultural Norms and Societal Factors – Broader societal views on dogs, breed legislation, and animal welfare standards.

Through this framework, the failure of DS/CC in trauma dogs becomes explicable. DS/CC (a Level 4 intervention) assumes the dog possesses sufficient neurobiological capacity (Level 3) to process the intervention. In traumatized dogs, Level 3 is typically compromised, characterized by a dominant autonomic nervous system and limbic threat detection, which suppresses the prefrontal cortex function necessary for learning (Arnsten, 2009). This state reflects a collapse of Siegel's (1999) window of tolerance, where the brainstem and limbic systems override the higher-order integrative functions of the prefrontal cortex. Applying DS/CC under these conditions represents a "Fixes that Backfire" systems archetype (Senge, 1990), adding load to a depleted system and driving it deeper into dysregulation. It is an attempt to impose a "seconds-to-minutes" cognitive solution on a system whose dysfunction is rooted in deeper, "hours-to-millions-of-years" levels.

Theoretical Alignment: Interpersonal Neurobiology and the Window of Tolerance

The CNSS framework is conceptually aligned with the principles of Interpersonal Neurobiology (IPNB) as articulated by Daniel J. Siegel (1999, 2012). IPNB posits that the mind emerges from the interaction between the brain, body, and relationships, and that well-being is characterized by "integration"—the linkage of differentiated parts of a system. A key IPNB concept is the "window of tolerance" (Siegel, 1999), which describes the optimal zone of autonomic arousal where an individual can effectively process emotions, learn, and engage flexibly with their environment.

·       Trauma and the Collapsed Window: In canine trauma cases, this window is severely constricted. Dogs operate predominantly outside this zone, in states of hyperarousal (equivalent to the CNSS Red Pathway, sympathetic dominance) or hypoarousal (Blue Pathway, dorsal vagal shutdown). In these states, the prefrontal cortex is functionally offline (Arnsten, 2009; Siegel, 2012), and the dog cannot access the cognitive, social, and behavioral flexibility required for DS/CC.

·       SPE&BE as a Window-Widening Protocol: The primary objective of the SPE&BE protocol is to systematically widen the dog's window of tolerance. This is achieved not through top-down cognitive instruction, but through bottom-up, body-based and sensory interventions that promote neural integration (Siegel, 2012).

o   SPEs work by creating repeated experiences of safety and positive affect within a relational context (caregiver-dog dyad), fostering the integration of sensory and emotional processing.

o   BEs directly target the vestibular and proprioceptive systems, which are fundamental to interoception—the sensing of the internal state of the body. Improving interoceptive awareness is a cornerstone of regulation and is essential for recognizing and modulating one's arousal level to remain within the window of tolerance (Siegel, 1999).

·       The White Pathway as a Transitional State: The CNSS concept of the White Pathway—the momentary, reachable state where the dog checks in or shows reduced arousal—can be understood as the nascent reappearance of the window of tolerance. It represents a fleeting moment of integration and regulatory capacity that SPE&BE aims to reinforce and expand.

The Sapolskian Lens: A Multi-Temporal Systems View of Canine Behavior

The structure of the CNSS Ten System Levels is powerfully informed by the interdisciplinary framework Robert Sapolsky (2017) outlines in Behave. Sapolsky argues that to truly understand a behavior, one must consider the factors that influenced it from seconds before it occurred to millions of years in our evolutionary past. The CNSS framework operationalizes this principle for canine behavior:

·       Levels 1-2 (Millions-to-Thousands of Days): These levels encompass the deep evolutionary history of the canine species (Level 1) and the individual's early developmental and epigenetic programming (Level 2). A trauma history here can create a foundational vulnerability, shaping a nervous system with a lower threshold for stress and a predisposition toward reactive, rather than reflective, responses.

·       Levels 3-5 (Minutes-to-Seconds): This is the domain of immediate neurobiological and physiological state (Level 3), past learning (Level 4), and real-time internal conditions (Level 5). It is here that the "battle" between the amygdala (triggering fear/aggression) and the prefrontal cortex (attempting impulse control) is fought and lost in a traumatized dog. As Sapolsky notes, when the amygdala is activated, it directly inhibits the prefrontal cortex, making rational behavior impossible.

·       Levels 6-10 (Contextual and Proximal): These levels represent the immediate social and environmental context, from the caregiver's state (Level 6) to societal norms (Level 10), which can either buffer or exacerbate the vulnerabilities established at deeper levels.

SPE&BE is fundamentally an intervention that works across these temporal scales. It uses Balance Exercises to directly regulate the "seconds-to-minutes" autonomic state (Level 3), calming the amygdala and creating the physiological conditions for prefrontal recovery. It uses Sensory Positive Experiences to create new, positive "hours-to-days" learning histories (Level 4) that can, over time, help rewire the negative associations formed during earlier trauma (Level 2). By addressing these foundational levels, it makes intervention at the behavioral level (Level 4, DS/CC) feasible.

The NeuroBalance Wheel: Operationalizing the Assessment of Prefrontal Readiness

A critical innovation of CNSS is the NeuroBalance Wheel, a tool designed to objectively assess whether a dog possesses the necessary prefrontal (executive) function to engage in cognitive-behavioral learning. This assessment is crucial because, as Sapolsky (2017) meticulously documents, the prefrontal cortex is not a monolithic "decider" but a fragile conductor of an orchestra of older, more powerful brain regions. It is highly metabolically expensive and is the first system to be compromised by stress, fatigue, or fear. The Wheel evaluates six domains, distinguishing between "bottom-up" processes (driven by the limbic and autonomic systems) and "emerging top-down" control (driven by the prefrontal cortex).  This dichotomy is well-established in neuroscience; stress and threat exposure impair prefrontal function, ceding control to more primitive, reactive brain structures (Arnsten, 2009).

A dog presenting with predominantly bottom-up indicators across the wheel lacks the neurobiological readiness for DS/CC. The six domains are (Smith, 2025):

1. Domain 01: Impulse Control

   • Bottom-up: Overexcitement, inability to stop behaviors, reactive responses without pause.

   • Emerging top-down: Resists immediate reaction, demonstrates controlled actions under mild stress, can pause before responding.

2. Domain 02: Body Regulation

   • Bottom-up: Frantic movements (pacing, jumping), physiological hyperarousal, inability to achieve stillness.

   • Emerging top-down: Maintains control over physical actions, can settle and remain calm, demonstrates postural stability.

3. Domain 03: Social Connection and Support

   • Bottom-up: Isolates under stress, avoids help, cannot access social support.

   • Emerging top-down: Seeks help when needed, check-ins with caregiver, uses social referencing.

4. Domain 04: Delayed Gratification

   • Bottom-up: Acts immediately without thought, cannot tolerate waiting, demands instant fulfillment.

   • Emerging top-down: Can manage short to longer-term delays before acting, demonstrates patience, tolerates waiting.

5. Domain 05: Cognitive Development

   • Bottom-up: Lessons need regular re-teaching, skills degrade under stress, no retention.

   • Emerging top-down: Retains new skills easily, demonstrates learning consolidation, generalizes across contexts.

6. Domain 06: Cognitive Flexibility

   • Bottom-up: Struggles with adapting to new situations, rigid behavioral patterns, cannot adjust.

   • Emerging top-down: Ability to adapt behavior in response to new information or changing contexts, recovers from surprises.

When four or more domains show "bottom-up" dominance, the conclusion is that the prefrontal cortex is functionally offline (Arnsten, 2009), and SPE&BE is indicated to build foundational capacity at Level 3.

Dispelling Myths: The Distinct Nature of SPE&BE

The necessity of SPE&BE is often misunderstood, even by experienced professionals. Clarifying these distinctions is crucial for its correct application.

·       Myth 1: "This is just enrichment or decompression."Truth: While enrichment provides stimulation and decompression reduces stress, SPE&BE is a targeted neurobiological readiness protocol. Enrichment and decompression are valuable for overall welfare but are not designed to systematically assess and rebuild specific neural pathways. SPE&BE requires a formal Sensory Pathway Assessment to identify and utilize only "non-contaminated" sensory channels, paired with mandatory vestibular-proprioceptive exercises specifically to modulate the limbic system and stabilize autonomic arousal. The goal is not merely to occupy or calm the dog, but to create measurable, foundational change in neural regulation to enable future learning.

·       Myth 2: "I already do sensory work with anxious dogs."Truth: Using scent games or enrichment for distraction differs fundamentally from SPE&BE's systematic methodology. Standard sensory work is often applied generally. SPE&BE mandates the identification of specific modalities that remain free of threat associations. Positive experiences are then delivered exclusively through these validated channels to build new, safe neural pathways as a prerequisite for regulation, not as a concurrent activity.

·       Myth 3: "I include balance and body awareness work in my programs."Truth: Adding proprioceptive exercises as skill-building or enrichment is not equivalent to SPE&BE's mandatory vestibular engagement. While others might teach "paw on a pod" as a trick, SPE&BE prescribes targeted Balance Exercises (BEs) in every session with the specific neurobiological objective of addressing vestibular system dysregulation. The goal is not skill acquisition but to leverage the direct vestibular-limbic pathways to reduce somatic hypervigilance and create the stable physiological "platform" required for prefrontal cortex engagement.

·       Myth 4: "This is just foundation training before behavior modification."Truth: Teaching "foundation skills" like impulse control or settle assumes the dog has the neurobiological capacity to learn them. SPE&BE recognizes that dogs locked in states of hyperarousal or shutdown cannot learn these skills because prefrontal cortex function is suppressed by a dominant stress response (Arnsten, 2009; Sapolsky, 2017). SPE&BE is the prerequisite work that builds this missing capacity at Level 3 (Neurobiological Capacity), establishing transitional state accessibility and emerging top-down indicators on the NeuroBalance Wheel, which then allows foundation training (a Level 4 intervention) to succeed.

·       Myth 5: "I already work sub-threshold and build positive associations."Truth: Sub-threshold exposure with counterconditioning (DS/CC) requires the dog to possess neurobiological readiness to process the experience through a regulated state. SPE&BE is necessary when assessment reveals a dog has no threshold distance where it can maintain a regulated state; it is locked in survival states even in "safe" environments. SPE&BE builds the capacity for state-shifting before exposure begins, preventing the sensitization that occurs when DS/CC is applied to an unprepared system, a classic "Fixes that Backfire" systems archetype (Senge, 1990).

·       Myth 6: "This is just going slower with behavior modification."Truth: SPE&BE is a distinct preparatory phase establishing capacity, not a slower version of exposure-based intervention. The work happens at different system levels entirely. "Slower DS/CC" still operates at Level 4, just with smaller steps. SPE&BE does not work on triggers at all during its preparatory phase. It builds neurobiological flexibility at Level 3 through non-contaminated sensory channels and vestibular engagement. Once readiness criteria are met, DS/CC can proceed at a standard pace because the system can now process the exposure.

The SPE&BE Protocol: Building Level 3 Capacity

The SPE&BE protocol is a structured, sequential process designed to build system capacity at Level 3 (Neurobiological Capacity and Regulation).

1. Assessment and Pathway Selection: The practitioner conducts a sensory pathway assessment to identify 2-3 modalities that elicit curiosity or calm, not defense. Olfactory and proprioceptive pathways often remain least contaminated in severe cases, as they can be engaged in ways that bypass hyper-vigilant visual/auditory systems (Perry & Szalavitz, 2017).

2. Core Component One: Sensory Positive Experiences (SPEs). Positive stimuli are delivered exclusively through the selected non-contaminated pathways. The goal is to activate prefrontal circuits through positive, non-threatening engagement. Research supports that positive, safe contact and engagement can increase prefrontal activation and support attentional and socioemotional regulation (Marti et al., 2022), strengthening its capacity without triggering the limbic threat system.

3. Core Component Two: Balance Exercises (BEs). Every session includes vestibular-proprioceptive activities. This component directly targets the vestibular system, driving sensorimotor integration and neuroplastic change in cortical and brainstem systems involved in postural control and attention (Müller et al., 2017). The resulting improvement in body awareness and postural control creates a "stable platform" from which the dog can better regulate arousal and engage cognitively, a principle well-documented in human sensorimotor therapies (Schmalzl et al., 2014).

4. Integration and Progression: SPEs and BEs are combined in structured, brief sessions that always conclude with a rest period for neural consolidation. This approach aligns with the Polyvagal Theory (Porges, 2011), emphasizing the need to cultivate the ventral vagal state (social engagement system) through safety and coregulation before demanding new learning.

   
   

Determining Readiness and Transitioning to DS/CC

The transition from SPE&BE to DS/CC is not arbitrary but guided by clear, observable indicators of neurobiological readiness, as measured by the CNSS framework:

• NeuroBalance Wheel Shift: A minimum of four domains show consistent "emerging top-down" indicators, suggesting restored prefrontal engagement (Arnsten, 2009).

• Consistent State-Shifting: Observable transitional states occur frequently, indicating improved autonomic flexibility (Porges, 2011).

• Improved Autonomic Regulation: Recovery time from mild stressors decreases significantly.

• Enhanced Co-regulation: The dog seeks caregiver proximity and synchronizes with their calm state (addressing Level 6).

Once these criteria are met, the system possesses the structural capacity at Level 3 and the regulatory flexibility to process DS/CC (Level 4) effectively. The same techniques that previously failed now succeed because they are applied to a prepared, rather than a depleted, system.

Conclusion

The integration of Sensory Positive Experiences and Balance Exercises within the Canine Neurobiological Systems Science framework represents a paradigm shift in addressing complex canine trauma. By utilizing the Ten System Levels for assessment and the NeuroBalance Wheel for measuring prefrontal readiness, SPE&BE addresses the root cause of intervention failure not by replacing evidence-based techniques, but by ensuring the dog's nervous system is structurally capable of benefiting from them. Grounded in principles of neurobiology, trauma, systems science, and the integrative framework of Interpersonal Neurobiology (Siegel, 1999, 2012), this protocol systematically builds capacity at Level 3 through non-contaminated sensory channels and targeted vestibular engagement. For professionals working with dogs for whom traditional methods have failed, this systematic, multi-level approach offers the missing foundational work that allows their expertise to finally yield success, transforming intervention from a symptomatic fix to a structural cure.

References

Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009). Stress signalling pathways that impair prefrontal cortex structure and function. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(6), 410–422.

Balaban, C. D., & Thayer, J. F. (2001). Neurological bases for balance-anxiety links. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 15(1-2), 53–79.

Marti, R., Petignat, M., Costanza, A., et al. (2022). Effects of contact with a dog on prefrontal brain activity: A controlled trial. PLOS ONE, 17(10), e0274833.

Müller, M. L. T. M., Albin, R. L., & Bohnen, N. I. (2017). Vestibular and proprioceptive dysfunction in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Neurology, 264(1), 1–6.

Perry, B. D., & Szalavitz, M. (2017). The Boy Who Was Raised as a Dog: And Other Stories from a Child Psychiatrist's Notebook. Basic Books.

Porges, S. W. (2011). The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.

Sapolsky, R. M. (2017). Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst. Penguin Press.

Schmalzl, L., Crane-Godreau, M. A., & Payne, P. (2014). Movement-based embodied contemplative practices: Definitions and paradigms. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 205.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.

Siegel, D. J. (1999). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. Guilford Press.

Siegel, D. J. (2012). The Developing Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Siegel, D. J. (2010). Mindsight: The New Science of Personal Transformation. Bantam.

Smith, S. (2025). SPE&BE as Neurobiological Readiness Protocol- A Systems Science Approach to Understanding Why Desensitization and Counterconditioning Fail in Trauma Dogs. [Preprint].

Smith, S. (2025). Sensory-based Positive Experience & Balance Exercise (SPE&BE) Instructional Guide for Dog Parents. [Preprint].

Sterman, J. D. (2000). Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.

Teixeira, L. A., de Oliveira, D. L., & Romano, R. G. (2020). Vestibular stimulation promotes anxiolytic effects in rodents. Journal of Vestibular Research, 30(1), 1-9.

Van der Kolk, B. A. (2014). The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma. Viking.

© Sparky Smith, 2025. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International.

This means you are free to share (copy and redistribute) this material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially, as long as you provide appropriate attribution and do not create adaptations of the work.

Learn more at: creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/